Two essentially different methods for physiological evaluation of coronary artery disease were compared in the setting of angioplasty and related to quantitative coronary angiography. Forty-five patients, referred for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), were examined by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and by coronary flow velocity measurements distal to the target stenosis.
Before PTCA, hyperemic mean transit time (HMTT) was correlated with % area stenosis r โซุโฌ 0.56*, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) r โซุโฌ 0.58* and with CFVR N (CFVR normalized to a mean blood pressure of 100 mmHg) r โซุโฌ 0.68*. The correlation between CFVR and % area stenosis was r โซุโฌ 0.72* (*P F 0.001). After PTCA, all correlations between these measurements disappeared. HMTT and CFVR remained abnormal in 18% and 32 % of the patients, respectively. Pre-PTCA, distal coronary flow velocity measurements were reasonably well related to the assessment of regional myocardial perfusion. Flow velocity parameters, however, were better related to angiographic stenosis parameters. After PTCA, HMTT showed a more consistent improvement compared to CFVR. Flow velocity measurements appear to be more useful for the evaluation of local coronary stenoses, whereas the assessment of regional myocardial perfusion by DSA may be used for a more general evaluation of vessel territories.