Comparison of calcium phosphate glass ceramics with apatite ceramics implanted in bone. An interface study—II
✍ Scribed by Christel P.A.T. Klein; Y. Abe; H. Hosono; K. de Groot
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 958 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0142-9612
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We developed a bioactive bone cement that consists of apatite and wollastonite containing glass-ceramic (AW-GC) powder and bisphenol-a-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) based resin. In this study, we made three types of cement (designated AWC, HAC, and TCPC) consisting of either AW-GC, hydroxyapatite
Alumina ceramic with a porous surface coated with glass ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite (AW-GC) was implanted in a state of press-fit under load-bearing conditions in the femoral condylus of the mongrel dog and compared with a non-glass-ceramic-coated alumina ceramic. A trapezoid alumina
This study investigated the in vivo performance of two composite injectable bone substitutes (IBS), each with different calcium-phosphate particles granulometries [40-80 (IBS 40-80) and 200-500 m (IBS 200-500)]. These biomaterials were obtained by associating a biphasic calciumphosphate (BCP) cerami
## Abstract Two glass ceramics in the CaOP~2~O~5~MgO system with the incorporation of K~2~O or TiO~2~ oxides were prepared with the goal of using them as potential bone graft substitutes. The incorporation of TiO~2~ and K~2~O led to the preparation of specific crystalline phases in the structure