## Abstract Although the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is widely used to monitor disease progression and drug efficacy, no attempts have been made to evaluate its scientific and clinical quality. Poor clinical sensibility of items in the activities of daily living (ADL) section a
Comparison of a timed motor test battery to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III in Parkinson's disease
✍ Scribed by Charlotte A. Haaxma; Bastiaan R. Bloem; George F. Borm; Martin W.I.M. Horstink
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 302 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0885-3185
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The most widely used scale currently available for the clinical evaluation of motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease (PD)—the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale‐III (UPDRS‐III) —is time‐consuming, subjective, and has suboptimal sensitivity. A brief timed motor test (TMT) battery could possibly overcome these drawbacks. Two hundred eighty‐eight PD patients (disease duration 3.1 years; preceding dopaminergic treatment initiation) were assessed with the UPDRS‐III and nine TMTs based on aspects of (a) walking, (b) writing, (c) single and double‐handed pegboard performance, (d) finger tapping, and (e) rapid alternating forearm movements. We investigated validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility. Completing the TMT battery took less than 5 minutes. The TMT correlated well with UPDRS‐III and disease duration. Two factors explained 61% of the TMT variance, the first represented mainly upper extremity function, the second mainly axial/lower extremity function. Cronbach's α was equal for the TMT and the UPDRS‐III (0.8). Test–retest reliability of the TMT sumscore was 0.93 to 0.89 for measurements separated by 3 up to 24 months, whereas UPDRS‐III correlations were 0.88 to 0.84. At group level, a trial using “change from baseline” as endpoint requires only 75% of the patients needed with the UPDRS‐III when applying the TMT battery, and 57% using the pegboard dexterity test. At patient level, TMT and UPDRS‐III were equally responsive. The TMT battery described here is valid, reliable, and feasible. Compared to the UPDRS‐III, it is more objective and more sensitive to change. Therefore, it could be a useful tool for both practical and scientific purposes. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Interrater reliability of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination was assessed by three neurologists experienced in the administration of this scale. Intraclass correlation coefficients indicated good‐to‐excellent agreement for speeded repeated movements,
## Abstract The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is widely used to asses Parkinson's disease (PD) disability but its metric properties have not been extensively studied. We investigated the factor structure and internal consistency of the Motor Examination section of the UPDRS in a
We developed a teaching tape of the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) to provide investigators with a visual document of three raters' interpretations of the scoring system for each item except rigidity. The rate of agreement for the selected samples was always si
Our objective was to assess the test-retest reliability of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The UPDRS is the most widely used instrument for measuring severity of parkinsonian symptoms in clinical research and in practice. The validity and inter-rater reliability of this scale h