Comparison of a new variant of PMF with other receptor modeling methods using artificial and real sediment PCB data sets
✍ Scribed by Philip A. Bzdusek; Erik R. Christensen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 498 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1180-4009
- DOI
- 10.1002/env.777
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A new variant of positive matrix factorization (PMF) is developed and compared to existing methods of PMF and eigenvalue-based factor analysis (FA) using an artificially created data set, including environmental variability and an environmental data set. Diagnostic tools are considered for the determination of the number of significant factors for all methods. The methodology for the new method of PMF is based on a nonnegative least squares (NNLS) technique combined with iterative rotations to eliminate negative elements from the source profile and source contribution matrices. The PMF and FA methods reproduce the source profiles for the artificial data set well, and the PMF method provides realistic source profiles for the real data set, whereas the FA method does not. The new method may be able to reproduce zero values better than PMF using penalty terms, and also appears to provide a better fit for the data since the minimum value of the weighted sum of squares of residuals Q is maintained during the rotations.