Comparison of 5-fluorouracil with 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate in metastatic colorectal carcinoma
β Scribed by Frederick Richards II; Thomas L. Pajak; Miles R. Cooper; Charles L. Spurr
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1975
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 289 KB
- Volume
- 36
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Thirty-eight patients with metastatic colorecal carcinoma were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and 38 patients were treated with the combination of 5-FU, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate. In terms of percent response, response duration, and survival there was no apparent difference between the two regimens. Combination chemotherapy was found to be effective in 6 of 16 patients refractory to treatment with 5-FU alone, but was associated with more morbidity.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Background: Colorectal carcinoma is the third leading cause of cancer-related death. the primary treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma is systemic chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-fu) and leucovorin (lv), a biomodulator of 5-fu that has been shown to enhance its activity
Thirty-two evaluable patients with metastatic carcinoma of the prostate were entered into a prospective randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide (CYC) with a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF). Progressive disease after endocrine manipulation was noted in 97% (3
## BACKGROUND. Diarrhea and oral mucositis are the most frequently reported gastrointestinal side effects caused by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Diarrhea may be severe in 10 -30% of patients and is schedule-dependent. 5-FU-induced gastrointestinal toxicity predominantly affects the upper and the lower g