✦ LIBER ✦

Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography–generated cephalograms

✍ Scribed by Paolo M. Cattaneo; Christian Borgkvist Bloch; Dorte Calmar; Mette Hjortshøj; Birte Melsen

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Landmark identification errors on cone-b

✍ Zwei-Chieng Chang; Fu-Chang Hu; Eddie Lai; Chung-Chen Yao; Mu-Hsiung Chen; Yi-Ja 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 965 KB

The reliability of cone-beam computed to

✍ So-Jin Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Yong-Il Kim; Bong-Hae Cho; Dae-Seok Hwang 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 408 KB

In Vivo Comparison of Conventional and C

✍ V. Kumar; J.B. Ludlow; L. Cevidanes; A. Mol 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 45 KB

Comparison of radiation dose for implant

✍ Anson C.M. Chau; Karl Fung 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 475 KB

Comparison of Cephalometric Radiographs

✍ Olivier J.C. van Vlijmen; Stefaan J. Bergé; Gwen R.J. Swennen; Ewald M. Bronkhor 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 515 KB

Comparison between cone-beam and multisl

✍ Munetaka Naitoh; Kino Nakahara; Yutaka Suenaga; Kenichi Gotoh; Shintaro Kondo; E 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 867 KB