𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

COMPARISON AMONG VARIOUS METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF IMPULSIVENESS

✍ Scribed by CARRILLO-DE-LA-PENA, M. T.; OTERO, J. M.; ROMERO, E.

Book ID
125533222
Publisher
Ammons Scientific
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
328 KB
Volume
77
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-5125

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Magnetic field exposure assessment: A co
Magnetic field exposure assessment: A comparison of various methods
✍ Elinor R. Schoenfeld; Kevin Henderson; Erin O'Leary; Roger Grimson; William Kaun πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 120 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

The accurate and valid measurement of personal exposure to magnetic fields poses a major challenge for epidemiologic studies. When considering the various methods to assess exposure, it is unclear which measures are most relevant for studies of human disease, if any. Given these uncertainties, the E

Comparison of various immunohistochemica
Comparison of various immunohistochemical methods
✍ V. Bergroth πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 946 KB

Immunofluorescence (IF) and immunoperoxidase (IP) methods for the demonstration of IgG bound to intercellular substance in pemphigus skin were compared. Direct and indirect IF and IP methods had comparable sensitivities. The use of undiluted primary antiserum gave false negative results with the ind