Various preference-based measures of health are available for use as an outcome measure in cost-utility analysis. The aim of this study is to compare two such measures EQ-5D and SF-6D in mental health patients. Baseline data from a Dutch multi-centre randomised trial of 616 patients with mood and/or
β¦ LIBER β¦
Comparing SF-6D and EQ-5D utilities across groups differing in health status
β Scribed by Nick Kontodimopoulos; Evelina Pappa; Angelos A. Papadopoulos; Yannis Tountas; Dimitris Niakas
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 260 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0962-9343
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D utilities
β
L. M. Lamers; C. A. M. Bouwmans; A. van Straten; M. C. H. Donker; L. Hakkaart
π
Article
π
2006
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 130 KB
A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D acro
β
John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Aki Tsuchiya; Jan Busschbach
π
Article
π
2004
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 180 KB
## Abstract As the number of preferenceβbased instruments grows, it becomes increasingly important to compare different preferenceβbased measures of health in order to inform an important debate on the choice of instrument. This paper presents a comparison of two of them, the EQβ5D and the SFβ6D (r
Comparison of the minimally important di
β
Stephen J. Walters; John E. Brazier
π
Article
π
2005
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 236 KB
Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF
β
Oriol Cunillera; Ricard Tresserras; Luis Rajmil; Gemma Vilagut; Pilar Brugulat;
π
Article
π
2010
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 224 KB
Comparing the sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6
β
Nick Kontodimopoulos; Evelina Pappa; Zinovia Chadjiapostolou; Eleni Arvanitaki;
π
Article
π
2010
π
Springer
π
French
β 209 KB
SF-6D versus EQ-5D: reasons for differen
β
Richard Grieve; Marina Grishchenko; John Cairns
π
Article
π
2008
π
Springer
π
French
β 210 KB