## Abstract This paper reports on investigations of the abilities of three different artificial neural network (ANN) techniques, multi‐layer perceptrons (MLP), radial basis neural networks (RBNN) and generalized regression neural networks (GRNN) to estimate daily pan evaporation. Different MLP mode
Comparing Multi-layer Perceptrons and Radial Basis Functions networks in speaker recognition
✍ Scribed by M.W. Mak; W.G. Allen; G.G. Sexton
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1993
- Weight
- 443 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0745-7138
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
We have compared the performance of Multi-layer Perceptrons networks (MLP) and Radial Basis Function networks (RBF) in the task of speaker identification. The experiments are carried out on 400 utterances ( 10 digits, in English) from 10 speakers. LPC-derived Cepstrum Coefficients are used as the speaker specific features. The results show that the MLP networks are superior in memory usage and classification time. Nevertheless, they suffer from long training time and the classification performance is poorer than that of the RBF networks.
The function centres of the RBF networks are either selected randomly from the training data or located by a (\mathrm{K})-mean algorithm. We find that (\mathrm{K})-mean clusteirng is an effective method in locating the function centres. We also find that by guaranteeing every speaker has similar number of function centres, the recognition performance can be improved further.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
I would like to express my thanks for the interest shown by the discussers and for their comments on the paper (Kişi, 2009). I have tried to clarify all the points raised by them in this reply. The discussers claim that '. . . the accuracy of estimated pan evaporation as presented by Kişi ( 2009) w