Comparing folding codes for proteins and polymers
β Scribed by Chan, Hue Sun; Dill, Ken A.
- Book ID
- 102648367
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 857 KB
- Volume
- 24
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0887-3585
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Proteins fold to unique compact native structures. Perhaps other polymers could be designed to fold in similar ways. The chemical nature of the monomer "alphabet" determines the "energy matrix" of monomer interactions-which defines the folding code, the relationship between sequence and structure. We study two properties of energy matrices using two-dimensional lattice models: uniqueness, the number of sequences that fold to only one structure, and encodability, the number of folds that are unique lowest-energy structures of certain monomer sequences. For the simplest model folding code, involving binary sequences of H (hydrophobic) and P (polar) monomers, only a small fraction of sequences fold uniquely, and not all structures can be encoded. Adding strong repulsive interactions results in a folding code with more sequences folding uniquely a n d more designable folds. Some theories suggest that the quality of a folding code depends only on the number of letters in the monomer alphabet, but we find that the energy matrix itself can be at least as important as the size of the alphabet. Certain multi-letter codes, including some with 20 letters, may be less physical or protein-like than codes with smaller numbers of letters because they neglect correlations among inter-residue interactions, treat only maximally compact conformations, o r add arbitrary energies to the energy matrix. o 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We study the transition of polymers in the dilute regime from a swollen shape at high temperatures to their lowβtemperature structures. The polymers are modeled by a single selfβavoiding walk (SAW) on a lattice for which __l__ of the monomers (the H monomers) are selfβattracting, i.e.,
The largest transcriptome reported so far comprises 60,770 mouse full-length cDNA clones, and is an effective reference data set for comparative transcriptomics. The number of mouse cDNAs identified greatly exceeds the number of genes predicted from the sequenced human and mouse genomes. This is lar