๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparing a genetic fuzzy and a neurofuzzy classifier for credit scoring

โœ Scribed by F. Hoffmann; B. Baesens; J. Martens; F. Put; J. Vanthienen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
159 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0884-8173

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In this paper, we evaluate and contrast two types of fuzzy classifiers for credit scoring. The first classifier uses evolutionary optimization and boosting for learning fuzzy classification rules. The second classifier is a fuzzy neural network that employs a fuzzy variant of the classic backpropagation learning algorithm. The experiments are carried out on a real life credit scoring data set. It is shown that, for the case at hand, the boosted genetic fuzzy classifier performs better than both the neurofuzzy classifier and the well-known C4.5(rules) decision tree(rules) induction algorithm. However, the better performance of the genetic fuzzy classifier is offset by the fact that it infers approximate fuzzy rules which are less comprehensible for humans than the descriptive fuzzy rules inferred by the neurofuzzy classifier.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Genetic evidence and integration of vari
โœ David E. Goldgar; Douglas F. Easton; Graham B. Byrnes; Amanda B. Spurdle; Edwin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 156 KB

## For the Mutation Pathogenicity Special Issue Genetic testing often results in the finding of a variant whose clinical significance is unknown. A number of different approaches have been employed in the attempt to classify such variants. For some variants, casecontrol, segregation, family history