๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Comparative study of tunnels by the boundary element method and the finite element method

โœ Scribed by V.F. Poterasu; N. Mihalache

Book ID
107934434
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1986
Weight
645 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0264-682X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

The scaled boundary finite-element metho
The scaled boundary finite-element method โ€“ a fundamental solution-less boundary-element method
โœ John P. Wolf; Chongmin Song ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 250 KB

In this boundary-element method based on ยฎnite elements only the boundary is discretized with surface ยฎnite elements yielding a reduction of the spatial dimension by one. No fundamental solution is necessary and thus no singular integrals must be evaluated and general anisotropic material can be ana

On the efficiency and accuracy of the bo
On the efficiency and accuracy of the boundary element method and the finite element method
โœ Subrata Mukherjee; Mahesh Morjaria ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 419 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The efficiency and computational accuracy of the boundary element and finite element methods are compared in this paper. This comparison is carried out by employing different degrees of mesh refinement to solve a specific illustrative problem by the two methods.