Comparative environmental risk assessment
β Scribed by Cothern, C. Richard
- Publisher
- Lewis Publishers;CRC Press
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 330
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
What data is needed to complete a quantitative risk assessment for environmental and public health?
How accurate does a quantitative risk assessment have to be?
How confident does a risk assessor need to be when presenting risk estimates to a decision maker?
Find out the answers to these questions and more with Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment, the first major commercial publication that describes the current state of the art in comparative environmental risk assessment. This book examines the problems involved in such analyses and offers ideas and thoughts for future development. The book examines major problems in this area and covers all aspects of the environment, including human and ecological health.
Comparative Environmental Risk Assessment is an excellent guide for risk assessment experts, environmentalists, regulators, planners, legislators, scientists in industry, instructors, and students
β¦ Table of Contents
Content: Part 1 Overview: introduction and overview of difficulties encountered in developing comparative rankings of environmental problems, C.R. Cothern
current concerns regarding the implementation of risk-based management - how real are they?, W.V. Garetz. Part 2 Ecological health risks: introduction, W. Cooper
ecological knowledge to environmental problems - ecological risk assessment, D. Policanski
the threat of greenhouse warming, R. Coppock. Part 3 Human Health Risks: introduction, P. Deisler
revising the risk assessment paradigm - limits on the quantitative ranking of environmental problems, E. Silbergeld
is it possible to do quantitative assessment of relative risk, J. Wilson
noncancer health endpoints - approaches to quantitative risk assessment, W. Farland and M. Dourson
risk assessment gapsiosis, A. Gregory
estimating viral disease risk from drinking water, J. Rose and C. Gerba. Part 4 Quantitative risk assessment problem areas and issues: introduction, M. Lippmann
atmospheric nitrogen oxides - a bridesmaid revisited, J. Bachmann
temporal variations in exposure assessment, N. Kim
an integrated approach to risk characterization of multiple pathway chemical exposures, C. DeRosa, M. Mumtaz, et al
a method for obtaining guidance for the combination of qualitative rankings by cancer and noncancer risks into a single, qualitative health risk ranking, P. Deisler
the use of statistical insignificance in the formulation or risk-based standards for carcinogens, R.E. Albert and R. Shulka
possible carcinogenic hazards from natural and synthetic chemicals - setting priorities, L. Gold, T. Slone, et al
the impact of data gaps in EPA's regional comparative risk projects, R. Day
the use of economic data and analysis in comparative risk project - questions of policy and reliability, P. Reisler. Part 5 Thoughts for the future: introduction, C.R. Cothern
the role of evidential reason and epistemic discourse in establishing the risk of environmental carcinogens, D. Crawford-Brown and J. Arnold
how to move quickly to risk-based environmental management - a specific proposal, W. Garetz.
β¦ Subjects
Medi ambient -- ContaminacioΜ -- Congressos.;ContaminacioΜ
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Decision making in environmental projects is typically a complex and confusing process characterized by trade-offs between socio-political, environmental, and economic impacts. Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) is a methodology applied to facilitate decision making when various activities compete
<p>Much has already been written about risk assessment. Epidemiologists write books on how risk assessment is used to explore the factors that influence the distribution of disease in populations of people. Toxicologists write books on how risk assessΒ ment involves exposing animals to risk agents a
Understanding risk to humans is one of the most important problems in environmental public health. Risk assessment is constantly changing with the advent of new exposure assessment tools, more sophisticated models, and a better understanding of disease processes. Risk assessment is also gaining grea