๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Comparative Effectiveness Research in Health Services

โœ Scribed by Adrian Levy, Boris Sobolev (eds.)


Publisher
Springer US
Year
2016
Tongue
English
Leaves
364
Series
Health Services Research
Edition
1
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The second volume in the Health Services Research series provides a series of perspectives on comparative effectiveness research. Motivated by concern from the general public, governments in virtually all countries with developed and rapidly developing economies have been actively seeking and promoting ways of improving the patient experience of health care, improving the health of populations, and reducing the per capita cost of health care. While comparing treatment outcomes is not a new concept, appreciation of its potential application has grown in recent years. In addition to traditional health sciences methods, modern approaches to comparative effectiveness research now include greater emphasis on social sciences frameworks such as economics, ethics, and implementation science. Moreover, a key feature of the modern approach to comparing treatment outcomes is a focus on the individual patient through explicit consideration of inter-patient variability and patient-reported outcomes.
Comparative Effectiveness Research presents a series of chapters of relevance including introductions to areas that are being incorporated when comparing treatments, country-specific applications, patient-centred approaches, and modern methods. Included are chapters on the following areas that are being considered in treatment comparisons: ethics, economics and costs, implementation science, modern payment schemes (coverage with evidence development), and priority setting. Country-specific examples include an overview chapter on national approaches from various countries in Europe, Australia, and Canada, as well as specific chapters on comparative effectiveness research in Brazil and in the United States. The focus on the individual patient is described through chapters on patient-centred comparative effectiveness research, individualized treatment, the link with personalized medicine, and incorporating patient and public input for treatment. Methodological chapters include overviews of data sources, study designs, new statistical methods of combining results, the link with evidence-based medicine, specific issues when comparing drug and non-drug technologies, and dissemination of results.

โœฆ Table of Contents


Front Matter....Pages i-xix
....Pages 1-5

โœฆ Subjects


Health Administration; Social Policy; Statistics for Life Sciences, Medicine, Health Sciences


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Methods in comparative effectiveness res
โœ Gatsonis, Constantine; Morton, Sally C ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2017 ๐Ÿ› Chapman and Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis ๐ŸŒ English

<P>Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition or to improve the delivery of care (IOM 2009). CER is conducted to develop evidence that w

Comparative Effectiveness Research
โœ Mary A. M. Rogers ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2013 ๐Ÿ› Oxford University Press, USA ๐ŸŒ English

The last decade has seen sweeping changes in US health care policy. With more changes on the way, the emerging field of comparative effectiveness research-the science of determining how different treatments work best for different conditions-is critical for patients and clinicians who wish to make w

Comparative Effectiveness and Efficacy R
โœ Carl A. Maida (auth.), Francesco Chiappelli (eds.) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2012 ๐Ÿ› Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg ๐ŸŒ English

<p><p>Recent trends in health care across the United States and internationally have emphasized a novel approach that consists in comparing the effectiveness and efficacy of treatment interventions with a patient-centered emphasis (i.e., evidence-based health care), while ensuring cost constraints,