✦ LIBER ✦

Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma

✍ Scribed by Ann E.Smith Sehdev; Camillo C Pan; Jonathan I Epstein

Book ID: 117818413
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 436 KB
Volume: 32
Category: Article
ISSN: 1532-8392
DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2001.24322

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Pathological Parameters of Radical Prost

Pathological Parameters of Radical Prostatectomy for Clinical Stages T1c Versus T2 Prostate Adenocarcinoma: Decreased Pathological Stage and Increased Detection of Transition Zone Tumors

✍ Jack, Gregory S.; Cookson, Michael S.; Coffey, Christopher S.; Vader, Virginia; 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB

Comparative analysis of prognostic facto

Comparative analysis of prognostic factors in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate, including DNA ploidy, surgical tumor stage, prostatic specific antigen, Gleason grade, and age

✍ Shockley, Kenneth F.; Maatman, Thomas J.; Carothers, George C.; Warzynski, Micha 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 468 KB 👁 2 views

One hundred consecutive men with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, treated by modified pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy, were evaluated, comparing DNA ploidy as determined by flow cytometry to surgical tumor stage (pT), preoperative prostatic specific antigen (PSA), Gleason