๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Community, Liberalism and Christian Ethics

โœ Scribed by David Herbert


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
54 KB
Volume
30
Category
Article
ISSN
0048-721X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


lack, loss, scarcity, competition for goods, fear of the power of the father and desire for the father. No less than Freud, she traces culture back to Moses. The author's work is both scholarly and political, a politic of memory and identity. She does not back away from the dark personal and political implications of monotheism, but she also sees the possibility and need for rewriting in every reading. In a closing figure that she draws from Ezekiel, she likens biblical texts to bones. Bones can come to life. Missing bones, Moses or Jesus, suggest the possibility of ascension. There can be re-vision, new thinking.

Schwartz wants to close the 'monotheistic' Bible without denying its reality. She wants new books, a multiplicity of books, that subvert the dominant vision of violence and scarcity and allow for the forging of identity in an 'ideal of plenitude and its corollary ethical imperative of generosity'. She writes that she longs to imagine (with the philosopher Gilles Deleuze) a vision that opposes the universal, turns the multiple into substantive multiplicities, and thinks in likenesses and analogies. What she brings to this longing is the memory of the textual reality of biblical narrative.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Medical ethics and the two dogmas of lib
โœ Terrence F. Ackerman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 813 KB

Two dogmas of liberalism in the therapeutic setting are challenged: (1) that patients have a ready-made ability to act autonomously; and (2) that non-intervention by physicians is the best strategy for protecting the autonomy of patients. Recognition of the impact of illness upon autonomous behavior

Ethics, AIDS, and community responsibili
โœ John Douard ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 912 KB

In the discussion of the responsibilities of society to the HIV infected and uninfected, a serious question seems to have been left out of the picture: To what extent are people who are not infected, have no special relationship to the infected and have no professional responsibilities for the care