The validity of the handicap principle has spawned much debate in spite of the existence of a formal treatment. Simple models constructed to further investigate the issue were able both to prove and to disprove some of its claims. Here I show with the aid of a more general model, which takes into ac
Communication in discrete action-response games
β Scribed by Peter L. Hurd
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 620 KB
- Volume
- 174
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5193
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
I present a simple game, the Basic Action-Response game, which allows investigation of the claim that signals must be costly to be reliable. The Basic Action-Response game is the simplest communication game possible, by investigating its parameters we are able to define clearly ''conflict'', ''handicap'', ''communication'' and other relevant concepts. I explore the conditions on the magnitude of the stabilizing cost and handicap that must hold in order to maintain the evolutionary stability of signalling. It will be demonstrated that stable communication need not make use of costly signals at ESS, not even ''on average'', and that ''negative handicaps'' can be stable as long as the stabilizing cost is large enough.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES