𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Commodity futures risk premium and unstable systematic risk

✍ Scribed by Jacky C. So


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
838 KB
Volume
7
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Premium and Unstable

Systematic Risk* Jacky C. So his article documents significant nonstationarity of systematic risk for the T wheat, corn and soybean futures contracts traded on the Chicago Board of Trade during the 1953-1976 period. The risk premium, however, remains insignificant statistically when the Hildreth and Houck (1968) random coefficient method is applied to improve the risk estimates. Our findings also indicate that the commodity price support programs and seasonality in the 1950s and early 1960s may have had significant influences on the nonstationarity.

I. INTRODUCTION

Considerable controversy exists over the significance of the risk premium in the futures market. Cootner (1960) found evidence to support the Keynesian normal backwardation theory (Keynes, 1930) that speculators are awarded premia for absorbing risk, but the results obtained by Telser (1958, 1960) were contrary. Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), Dusak (1973) has found that the risk premia for the futures contracts for wheat, corn and soybeans traded on the Chicago Board of Trade are not significant statistically. Her methodology is criticized by Carter, Rausser and Schmitz (1983), despite the fact that the systematic risk concept is more theoretically sound than the total risk concept of Keynes.

Carter, Rausser and Schmitz (CRS) have recommended a stochastic regression and a multi-index model to capture the changing positions (long and short) of *The author thanks Radeliffe Edmonds and the referees of this Journal for valuable suggestions and comments. Jay Sheu provides computer assistance. Conversations with Neil Myer were also helpful to the author. This project is supported by the Graduate School, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville. The author is solely responsible for atly ermrs in this study.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Do futures prices for commodities embody
✍ Richard Deaves; Itzhak Krinsky πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 608 KB

The authors acknowledge the helpful comments of two anonymous referees and the very capable research assistance of Kevin Brewer. 'From here on, the term backwardation is used in place of the more cumbersome normal backwardation. It should be noted that backwardation sometimes refers to the situatio

Do systematic risk premiums persist in e
✍ Tim Krehbiel; Lee C. Adkins πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 755 KB

The properties of interest rate futures contract prices have recently received substantial attention from academic researchers because of increased trading opportunities in these contracts and the expanded use of interest rate futures contract prices in the valuation of derivative products. ' The re

Options on bond futures: Isolating the r
✍ Robert G. Tompkins πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 509 KB

## Abstract The introduction of unspanned sources of risk (and frictions) implies that option prices include a risk premium. Prima facie evidence of the existence of risk premia in option prices is contained in the implied volatility smile patterns reported in the literature. This article isolates

Risk premiums and predictive ability of
✍ Nikolay Gospodinov; Ibrahim Jamali πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 162 KB

## Abstract This study provides an in‐depth analysis of risk premiums in the Canadian Bankers' Acceptances futures (BAX) market. The predictive regressions for excess and holding‐period returns on BAX futures lend empirical support to the presence of time‐varying risk premiums especially at longer

Endogenous risks and the risk premium
✍ Eric Briys; Louis Eeckhoudt; Henri LoubergΓ© πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› Springer US 🌐 English βš– 399 KB

This note tries to correct a deficiency of the microeconomic literature on decision making under uncertainty. Indeed, when considering meaningful comparative statics results in situations where risks are at least partially controllable (endogenous), this literature has mostly relied upon the traditi