Comments on the paper “On the derivation of the constitutive equation of the simple fluid from that of a simple material” by R.R. Huilgol
✍ Scribed by R. S. Rivlin; G. F. Smith
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 643 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0035-4511
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
In spite of the ambiguity in analyzing the eclipse flash spectrum, pointed out by Giovanelli (1975), the general conclusion of Kanno et al. (1971) is shown to be still valid. Giovanelli (1975) has criticized the conclusion of Kanno et al. (1971), hereafter referred to as Paper I, that coronal emissi
## Abstract Force's (2008) theory cannot explain the birth of several major ancient civilizations, including those in Egypt and China. In addition, most of the ancient civilizations considered in Force's research were not primary civilizations and they had been influenced to some extent by other, e
Abstrad-It has been shown that the equation of state for adsorption from solution presented by Nikitas [Electrochim. Acto 32, 1279 (1987)] has, in fact, been derived before in the literature [Karolnak and Mohilner, J. phys. Chem. 86, 2840 (1982)]. Some inconsistencies and pitfalls in the Nikitas der
used to derive a partial preference ordering. For two recent methods see Salo and HaÈ maÈ laÈ inen (1992, 1995) and for an overview see Weber (1987). From empirical research we know that subjects are prone to biases. In addition, as pointed out by the authors, verbal expressions used in the AHP migh