𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comments on ‘solar polar spindown’, by Kenneth Schatten

✍ Scribed by Peter A. Gilman


Publisher
Springer
Year
1974
Tongue
English
Weight
246 KB
Volume
36
Category
Article
ISSN
0038-0938

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Schatten (1973)

purports to show that it is possible for the observed surface differential rotation of the Sun to be explained as being due to differential solar wind torques. I wish to argue in this note that the conclusions Schatten draws are untenable. Schatten ignores a number of important observations, ignores much of the published literature concerning theoretical fluid dynamics applied to the solar convection and differential rotation problem, and makes some highly unreasonable assumptions concerning the nature of convective turbulence. The result is a gross underestimate of the strength of turbulent mixing in the convection zone. My points are as follows:


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comments on Schatten's reply to my comme
✍ Peter A. Gilman 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB

Nothing Schatten (1974) has said causes me to alter any of the earlier criticisms of Schatten (1973) made in Gilman (1974). However, I am compelled to respond additionally to his response as follows: First, Schatten (1974) is incorrect in saying that in Gilman (1972) I proposed the "Earth's Rossby

Solar irradiance modulation by active re
✍ Sabatino Sofia; Ludwig Oster; Kenneth Schatten 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 577 KB

The solar irradiance modulation due to active regions during 1980 has been investigated in detail. Specifically, we estimate the uncertainties caused by ground-based data used as input in the modeling effort, and by our currently incomplete knowledge of the proper parameters that describe the angula