✦ LIBER ✦

Comments on “significance tests harm progress in forecasting”

✍ Scribed by Keith Ord

Book ID: 113647912
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 84 KB
Volume: 23
Category: Article
ISSN: 0169-2070
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.01.011

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Significance tests harm progress in fore

Significance tests harm progress in forecasting: Comment

✍ H.O. Stekler 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB

Significance tests harm progress in fore

Significance tests harm progress in forecasting

✍ J. Scott Armstrong 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 131 KB

Should we be using significance tests in

Should we be using significance tests in forecasting research?

✍ Paul Goodwin 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB

Some comments on estimation in regressio

Some comments on estimation in regression after preliminary tests of significance

✍ M.E. Bock; G.G. Judge; T.A. Yancey 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 506 KB

The significance of the significance tes

The significance of the significance test controversy: comments on ‘Size Matters’

✍ Peter Lunt 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 50 KB

Comments on testing for forecast and spe

Comments on testing for forecast and specification optimality using linear composites

✍ Robert F. Phillips 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 450 KB

This paper extends the method of using linear composites of forecasts for testing the efficiency of one forecast compared to a finite collection of other forecasts. It also gives necessary and sufficient conditions for forecast optimality in the mean square error sense. Information sets are found to