✦ LIBER ✦

Comments on rogeness, stokes, bednar & gorman

✍ Scribed by Kenneth E. Smith

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1977
Tongue: English
Weight: 196 KB
Volume: 5
Category: Article
ISSN: 0090-4392
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6629(197707)5:3<257::aid-jcop2290050309>3.0.co;2-i

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A comment on the paper ‘finite differenc

A comment on the paper ‘finite difference methods for the stokes and Navier-Stokes equations’ by J. C. Strikwerda

✍ Patrick J. Roache 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 387 KB

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis treat

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis treated successfully with an anti–tumor necrosis factor agent: Comment on the article by Gorman et al

✍ Colleen Matejicka; G. James Morgan; John G. Schlegelmilch 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB 👁 1 views

Comment on ‘application of generalized q

Comment on ‘application of generalized quadrature to solve two-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations’, By C. Shu and B. E. Richards

✍ Faruk Civan 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 153 KB

Comment on ‘generalized potential flow t

Comment on ‘generalized potential flow theory and direct calculation of velocities applied to the numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes and the Boussinesq equations’

✍ S. Abdallah; S. Deutsch 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 123 KB

In a recent paper a generalized potential flow theory and its application to the solution of the Navier-Stokes equation are developed.' The purpose of this comment is to show that the analysis presented in that paper is in general not correct. We note that the theoretical development of Reference 1