✦ LIBER ✦

Comments on letter by J.J. Brenden

✍ Scribed by A.F. Roberts

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1967
Tongue: English
Weight: 310 KB
Volume: 11
Category: Article
ISSN: 0010-2180
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(67)90069-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comments on two papers by J. J. Wu

✍ R.R. Clements; R.D. Milne 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 323 KB

Comments on letter by Ritchie

✍ José O. Valderama; Alfredo L. Gordon 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 182 KB

Comments on letter by K. Somogyi

✍ A. Wolkenberg; T. Przesławski; J. Klamka 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB

Authors' reply to comments by J.J.J. Che

Authors' reply to comments by J.J.J. Chen

✍ L.T. Fan; Y.W. Huang; N. Yutani 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 123 KB

Furthermore, von Karman and Tsien (1938) found the formula (LJ = (2J" in "closer agreement with experimental data". More recently, Svoboda and Hartman (1981) and Hartman and Svoboda (1986) have used the following formula in fluidization studies. Il 1.81 x 1O-5 (10) Thus, if either eq. (8) or (9), du

Author's reply to comments by J.J.J. Che

Author's reply to comments by J.J.J. Chen

✍ W.R. Paterson 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB

Comments on letter by O. P. Bhardwaj

✍ O. Molerus 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

## Dear Sirs, In his above mentioned letter to the editors Mr. Bhardwaj claims that by using V/E as the actual fluid velocity in the derivations of my paper [I],1 have used the tube flow analogy again. As isshowninthe