✦ LIBER ✦

Comments on cumulus glaciation papers by P. V. Hobbs and A. L. Rangno

✍ Scribed by Alan M. Blyth; John Latham

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 161 KB
Volume: 124
Category: Article
ISSN: 0035-9009
DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712454716

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to “Comments by Alan M. Blyth and

Reply to “Comments by Alan M. Blyth and John Latham on ‘Cumulus glaciation papers by P. V. Hobbs and A. L. Rangno’”

✍ Peter V. Hobbs; Arthur L. Rangno 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 230 KB

Comment on the paper by A. K. Betts ‘Non

Comment on the paper by A. K. Betts ‘Non-precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization’

✍ J. W. Deardorff; G. E. Willis; D. K. Lilly 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 135 KB

Comments on the paper by W.A. Baumgartne

Comments on the paper by W.A. Baumgartner and V.A. Hill: sample preparation techniques

✍ David A. Kidwell; David L. Blank 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 584 KB

On the existence of In2O(c) (Comment on

On the existence of In2O(c) (Comment on a paper by T. J. Anderson and L. F. Donaghey)

✍ A.J Van Dillen; J.W Geus; J.H.W de Wit 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB

Comments on a paper by T. L. Ogden and K

Comments on a paper by T. L. Ogden and K.O.L.F. Jayaweera, ‘Drag coefficients of water droplets decelerating in air’

✍ L. A. Mathews; D. L. Salt; T. L. Ogden 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 118 KB

On the Estimation of the Mean with Rando

On the Estimation of the Mean with Random Number Of Observations. (Comments on a Paper by M. Singh and V. K. Gupta)

✍ Dr. B. G. Lindqvist 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 217 KB 👁 1 views

## Summuy I n this paper we study the problem of eatimating the mean when the number of observations taken on each unit is 8 random variable. The estimator proposed by M. SIXOH and V. K. GUPTA (1980) is discussed and modified. It is argued, however, that the arithmetic mean is a more appropriate c