✦ LIBER ✦

Comments, on "Comparison of the FFT conjugate gradient method and the finite-difference time domain method for the 2-D absorption problem" [with reply]

✍ Scribed by Sarkar, T.K.; Borup, D.T.; Gandhi, O.P.

Book ID: 114552079
Publisher: IEEE
Year: 1988
Tongue: English
Weight: 639 KB
Volume: 36
Category: Article
ISSN: 0018-9480
DOI: 10.1109/22.3502

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A new method based on finite-difference

A new method based on finite-difference time-domain scheme for computing the band structure of 2D photonic crystals

✍ Juhong Zou; Zheng Liang; Zongjun Shi 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Optics InfoBase 🌐 English ⚖ 392 KB

Comparison of the transmission-line matr

Comparison of the transmission-line matrix and finite-difference time-domain methods for a problem containing a sharp metallic edge

✍ Simons, N.R.S.; Siushansian, R.; LoVetri, J.; Cuhaci, M. 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 IEEE 🌐 English ⚖ 107 KB

On the comparison between multiple-regio

On the comparison between multiple-region and dual-grid finite-difference time-domain methods for the analysis of antenna arrays

✍ Romain Pascaud; Raphaël Gillard; Renaud Loison 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 576 KB

## Abstract A comparison between the multiple‐region (MR) and dual‐grid (DG) finite‐difference time‐domain (FDTD) methods for the analysis of antenna arrays is presented.The application of both methods shows that the DG‐FDTD method is more accurate when computing the mutual coupling between antenna