𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Commentary on Cost– utility and value-of-information analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 210– 219)

✍ Scribed by W. D. B. Clements


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
203 KB
Volume
97
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cost–utility and value-of-information an
✍ P. P. Velu; K. Hor; S. Leighton; S. E. Yeoh; M. Duxbury 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 106 KB 👁 2 views

The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published

Authors' reply: Cost–utility and value-o
✍ E. Wilson; K. Gurusamy; C. Gluud; B. R. Davidson 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 106 KB 👁 1 views

The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published

Cost–utility and value-of-information an
✍ E. Wilson; Mr K. Gurusamy; C. Gluud; B. R. Davidson 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 203 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background A recent systematic review found early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) to be safe and to shorten total hospital stay compared with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) for acute cholecystitis. The cost-effectiveness of ELC versus DLC for acute cholecystitis is un

Letter 1: Prospective randomized trial u
✍ K. Hussey; P. Witherspoon 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 91 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited a