𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Commentary: Direction of causation models

✍ Scribed by Jack Goldberg; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
309 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Direction of causation: Reply to comment
Direction of causation: Reply to commentaries
✍ Michael C. Neale; David L. Duffy; Nicholas G. Martin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 607 KB

## Abstract We reply to the commentaries on the lead papers by Neale et al. [1994a] and Duffy and Martin [1994]. Topics covered include power calculations, cross‐sectional measurement vs. lifetime reports, the appropriateness of the direction of causation (DOC) model, extensions to study causation

Appropriate questions about causal infer
Appropriate questions about causal inference from β€œdirection of causation” analyses
✍ J. J. McArdle πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 367 KB

## THE DIRECTION OF CAUSATION MODEL My comments here are stimulated by the interesting lead articles on the "Direction of Causation" (DOC) model by Neale et al. [I9921 and by Duffy and Martin [1992]. In this paradigm, MZ and DZ twin paris are measured on at least two variables (X and Y ) , and a v

Inferring the direction of causation in
Inferring the direction of causation in cross-sectional twin data: Theoretical and empirical considerations
✍ Dr. David L. Duffy; Nicholas G. Martin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 953 KB

A recent multivariate extension of the classical twin study in theory allows the inference of the direction of causation between correlated traits solely using crosssectional data. In this paper we briefly review this model and assess its usefulness by applying it to a number of pairs of biological

Direct Limits of Models
Direct Limits of Models
✍ Robert Fittler πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1970 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 495 KB
Commentary on β€œTM and our models of info
Commentary on β€œTM and our models of informed consent” by Charles W. Lidz
✍ Anthony Charuvastra; Stephen Marder πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 57 KB

## Lidz offers a new critique of what he calls the ''strong version'' of informed consent. The critique is part of the larger question ''How should we define ethical research?''. He describes a formal model where I is adequate information about the nature, risks, and benefits of a clinical experi