𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Commentary: Comparison of current flow cytometry methods for monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis detection

✍ Scribed by Wendy G. Nieto; Julia Almeida; Cristina Teodosio; Fatima Abbasi; Sallie D. Allgood; Fiona Connors; Jane M. Rachel; Paolo Ghia; Mark C. Lanasa; Andy C. Rawstron; Alberto Orfao; Neil E. Caporaso; Curt A. Hanson; Youn K. Shim; Robert F. Vogt; Gerald E. Marti


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
102 KB
Volume
78B
Category
Article
ISSN
1552-4949

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is now recognized as the B‐lymphocyte analogue of a monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance. MBL can be the precursor of chronic lymphocytic leukemia or associated with non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma. It may be associated with an autoimmune abnormality or be related to aging (immunosenescence). The combination of available new fluorochrome‐conjugated monoclonal antibody reagents, multilaser instrumentation, and improved software tools have led to a new level of multicolor analysis of MBL. Presently, several centers, including the University of Salamanca (Spain), Duke University (Durham, NC), Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), and the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD) in conjunction with the Genetics and Epidemiology of Familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia Consortium, the Food and Drug Administration (Bethesda, MD), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (Atlanta, GA) in collaboration with Saint Luke's Hospital (Kansas City, MO), the Università Vita‐Salute San Raffaele in Milan (Italy), and Leeds Teaching Hospital (UK) are all actively conducting studies on MBL. This commentary is an updated summary of the current methods used in these centers. It is important to note the diversity of use in reagents, instruments, and methods of analysis. Despite this diversity, there is a consensus in what constitutes the diagnosis of MBL and its subtypes. There is also an emerging consensus on what the next investigative steps should be. Published 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of Vindelov et al. and bromod
✍ Alberto Orfao; Santiago Carbajo; Frank Dolbeare; Juana Ciudad; Antonio Lopez; Ed 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 410 KB 👁 2 views

This study compares the cell cycle distribution in rat thymocytes obtained by means of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) labeling of S-phase cells and the analysis of the S-phase fraction obtained according t o the technique ofvindelov et al. (Cytometry 3332-338,1983). The proportion of BrdUrd-labeled cell