✦ LIBER ✦

Commentaries on ‘Conventional occlusion versus pharmacological penalization for amblyopia’

✍ Scribed by John J. Sloper; Jaime Tejedor

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 62 KB
Volume: 5
Category: Article
ISSN: 1557-6272
DOI: 10.1002/ebch.628

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Cochrane Review: Conventional occlusion

Cochrane Review: Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia

✍ Tianjing Li; Kate Shotton 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 349 KB

better visual acuity. . . . . . .

Summary of ‘Conventional occlusion versu

Summary of ‘Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia’

✍ Evidence-Based Child Health Canadian Editorial Office 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 39 KB

Commentary on ‘Elective high frequency o

Commentary on ‘Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants’

✍ Eric C. Eichenwald; Ann R. Stark 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 50 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract This is a commentary on a Cochrane review, published in this issue of EBCH, first published as: Henderson‐Smart DJ, Cools F, Bhuta T, Offringa M. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. __Cochran