✦ LIBER ✦

Comment on the Tool-Narayanaswamy model parameters derived by Huang and Gupta

✍ Scribed by J.-P. Ducroux; S.M. Rekhson

Book ID: 115989788
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1994
Tongue: English
Weight: 252 KB
Volume: 169
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-3093
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90234-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comment on “Bayesian recursive parameter

Comment on “Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models” by M. Thiemann, M. Trosset, H. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian

✍ Beven, Keith; Young, Peter 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 American Geophysical Union 🌐 English ⚖ 73 KB

Comments on ?Geostatistics: Models and t

Comments on ?Geostatistics: Models and tools for the earth sciences? by A. G. Journel

✍ Serra, Jean 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 358 KB

Comments on "A derivation of the normal

Comments on "A derivation of the normal equation in FIR Wiener filters" by Y.-D. Huang and C.-T. Chen

✍ Picinbono, B. 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 IEEE 🌐 English ⚖ 226 KB

REPLY TO THE COMMENTS BY S. K. GUPTA ON

REPLY TO THE COMMENTS BY S. K. GUPTA ON : “Seismic Model Studies on Difraction of Waves by Edges of Varying Radius of Curvature and Depth”

✍ S. DATTA; A. N. BHOWMICK 📂 Article 📅 1976 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 132 KB

Comments on ‘the derivation and validati

Comments on ‘the derivation and validation of a new model for the interception of rainfall by forests’, by W.J. Massman

✍ Piers J. Sellers 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 80 KB

Comments on a paper by P. Nikitas: “on t

Comments on a paper by P. Nikitas: “on the derivation of the state equation in models of adsorption from solution” and some nuances of adsorption modelling

✍ Marian Karolczak 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 716 KB

Abstrad-It has been shown that the equation of state for adsorption from solution presented by Nikitas [Electrochim. Acto 32, 1279 (1987)] has, in fact, been derived before in the literature [Karolnak and Mohilner, J. phys. Chem. 86, 2840 (1982)]. Some inconsistencies and pitfalls in the Nikitas der