✦ LIBER ✦

Comment on the strength differential (SD) effect in TD nickel

✍ Scribed by Wilcox, B. A. ;Clauer, A. H. ;Luetjering, G.

Book ID: 112808268
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 1972
Weight: 193 KB
Volume: 3
Category: Article
ISSN: 0026-086X
DOI: 10.1007/bf02643063

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comment on “The effective modulus interp

Comment on “The effective modulus interpretation of the strength-differential effect in ferrous alloys”

✍ W.C. Leslie 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 53 KB

Comments on “The strength differential a

Comments on “The strength differential and bauschinger effects in SiC-Al composites”

✍ P.J. Withers; O.B. Pedersen; L.M. Brown; W.M. Stobbs 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 305 KB

Comments on: The strength-differential p

Comments on: The strength-differential phenomenon in Zircaloy-2

✍ K.U. Snowden 📂 Article 📅 1971 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 63 KB

Some comments on “the effective modulus

Some comments on “the effective modulus interpretation of the strength differential effect in ferrous alloys”

✍ N. Louat; J.M. Galligan 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 62 KB

Further comments on the effective modulu

Further comments on the effective modulus interpretation of the strength differential effect in ferrous alloys

✍ N. Louat; J.M. Galligan 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 92 KB

Further comments on “the strength differ

Further comments on “the strength differential and bauschinger effects in SiC-Al composites”

✍ R.J. Arsenault; M. Taya 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 217 KB

Withers et al. [2] have pointed out that the comment made by Arsenault and Wu [1] about Pedersen et al. [3] composite model of the Bauschinger effect (BE) is "misconceived". It is our understanding that the comment of Arsenault and Wu [1] was "misconceived". However, before addressing the other spec