Table of our paper showing calculated ionization energies of Fe, Ru and OS is given with correction. It is emphasized that the energy characteristics calculated using a pseudo-potential should be compared with other pseudo-potential or all-electron values calculated with a comparable basis set.
Comment on “comparison of the widely used HF pseudo-potentials: MH+ (M = Fe, Ru, Os)”
✍ Scribed by Dirk Andrae; Michael Dolg; Hermann Stoll; Walter C. Ermler
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 340 KB
- Volume
- 220
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0009-2614
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
It is shown through caloulations of the ionization energies of the Fe and Ru atoms that errors attributed to pseudo-potential defects in a recent paper by Leininger et al. [Chem. Phys. Letters 205 (1993) 3011 are due, instead, to shortcomings of their valence-interaction treatment. ' Present address: US Department of Energy, ER-30/GTN, *' This state is erroneously designated 'F(d's') in ref.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We compared the molecular characteristics of the cation of diatomic metal hydrides of the group-8 atoms (FeH+, RuH+, OsH\* ) calculated with the HF pseudo-potentials of Christiansen et al., Hay and Wadt, St011 and Preuss et al., and others. Atomic basis functions of comparable quality optimized for