✦ LIBER ✦

Comment on a letter of P. Chattopadhyay

✍ Scribed by P.G.L. Leach

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1981
Tongue: English
Weight: 563 KB
Volume: 84
Category: Article
ISSN: 0375-9601
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(81)90745-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comment on Venables letter

✍ Peter B. Billings; Sallie O. Hoch; Dennis A. Carson; John H. Vaughan 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 219 KB 👁 1 views

Comments on letter by O. P. Bhardwaj

✍ O. Molerus 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

## Dear Sirs, In his above mentioned letter to the editors Mr. Bhardwaj claims that by using V/E as the actual fluid velocity in the derivations of my paper [I],1 have used the tube flow analogy again. As isshowninthe

Comment on the letter by Calin et a1

✍ Peter McCluskey; Denis Wakefield 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 255 KB 👁 1 views

Editorial comment on the letter by Lurie

Editorial comment on the letter by Lurie and Ilyina on familial omphalocele

✍ Baird, P. A. 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 57 KB 👁 1 views

Comment on an aspect of a Letter of Shiv

Comment on an aspect of a Letter of Shivamoggi and Muilenburg

✍ P.G.L. Leach 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 162 KB

Comments on letter of Sadler and Pounder

✍ Jorma Hirvonen; Pirkko Huttunen 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 51 KB

The authors point out some pitfalls concerning the use of the urinary catecholamine concentrations as a test for antemortem hypothermia. Use of creatinine concentration when measuring the catechols as reference is a feasible approach, which we have also considered, but not yet systematically tested