Comment on “a comparison of the boundary element and superposition methods”
✍ Scribed by G. Beer
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 139 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0045-7949
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In many cases, boundary integral equations contain a domain integral. This can be evaluated by discretization of the domain into domain elements. Historically, this was seen as going against the spirit of boundary element methods, and several methods were developed to avoid this discret
Harding and Pagan note that their stripped-down Markov-switching model (3) -( 5) is an example of a standard state-space model, albeit with non-Gaussian innovations. This is indeed true of a broad class of Markov-switching models, as noted by Hamilton (1994, Section 4.1). Hence, one could always use
The efficiency and computational accuracy of the boundary element and finite element methods are compared in this paper. This comparison is carried out by employing different degrees of mesh refinement to solve a specific illustrative problem by the two methods.