A comparison has been made between dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and Naphthol Yellow S (NYS) as protein stains in combination with the pararosaniline-SO2 Feulgen procedure. Chicken erythrocytes were used as test cells. Cytophotometric measurements were made using a Zeiss scanning stage cytophotometer coupled to a PDP 11/10 minicomputer using the BICOSCAN program to obtain values for protein per cell, protein per "nuclear area' and DNA per nucleus. With 5N HCl as the Feulgen hydrolysis agent, DNFB staining, applied before the Feulgen procedure, was found to be unaffected by hydrolysis conditions required to give optimum Feulgen staining and showed only small losses after longer hydrolysis times. On the other hand measurements of NYS staining, of necessity applied after the Feulgen procedure, seem to be susceptible to the duration of Feulgen hydrolysis. This susceptibility is probably due to the interaction of the DNA phosphates with the basic amino acid residues, potential binding sites for NYS. Since the degree of this interaction may be variable, it is argued that NYS binding will measure the available basicity of proteins at the time of staining but no specific protein fraction. DNFB binding is unaffected by DNA-protein interactions and therefore can give a more reliable measure of "nuclear' protein, particularly in conjunction with Feulgen-DNA measurements.