๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Combination chemotherapy for breast cancer metastatic to bone marrow

โœ Scribed by Rosalba Rodriguez-Kraul; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi; Aman U. Buzdar; George R. Blumenschein


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
595 KB
Volume
48
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Seventy-nine patients with metastatic breast cancer underwent examination of their bone marrow as part of their staging workup. Thirty-one (3%) showed no evidence of bone marrow involvement (BM-); 48 (61%) were found to have bone marrow metastases (BM+). Both groups of patients were treated with intensive chemotherapy with 5-FU, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and nonspecific immunotherapy with BCG, methanol extraction residue, or Levamisole. The groups were comparable in age, race, menopausal status, and disease-free interval; however, the BM+ group had a higher proportion of patients with dominant osseous disease and a somewhat lower overall tumor burden. Ten of 21 patients in the BM + group treated with 1OO?k of the calculated dose of chemotherapy are still alive, compared with only three of 27 patients treated with lower doses. A similar dose response was observed in the BM -group. Myelosuppression was more common and more severe in the BM + group.

Hematologic support, i.e., packed erythrocytes and platelet transfusions, was required in 60% of BM+ patients, as opposed to 26% of BM -. Infectious complications were aiso higher in the BM + group, in which five episodes of sepsis and two infectious deaths were observed. These results suggest that metastatic breast cancer patients with bone marrow invasion achieve excellent palliation with aggressive high-dose chemotherapy. Higher morbidity requiring aggressive supportive care suggests that these patients should be treated by physicians and centers experienced in their management.

Cancer 48:227-232. 1981.

OMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY programs have C proven to be effective in the management of metastatic breast cancer with response rates between 50-

80%.1-3

The presence of metastatic cancer in bone marrow has been considered a grave prognostic sign, reflecting widespread dissemination. Treatment with cytotoxic agents was once thought to be contraindicated because of decreased marrow reserve and the possibility of further marrow depression, infection, and h e m ~r r h a g e . ~, ~ However, recent reports have described success in the management of patients with breast carcinoma in bone marrow with different combination chemotherapy pro-From the Medical Breast Section,


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Estrogen receptor profile of patients wi
โœ G. Thomas Budd ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1983 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 252 KB

The estrogen receptor (ER) profile of patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone marrow (BM) has not been widely reported. The charts of all patients having a diagnosis of breast cancer and undergoing bone marrow aspiration or biopsy at the Cleveland Clinic during the period of January 1980 thro

Combination chemotherapy for metastatic
โœ Ambrose Aboud; Aman U. Buzdar; Hwee-Yong Yap; Gabriel N. Hortobagyi; George R. B ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 270 KB

Twenty-nine patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with fluorouracil, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide (FAC), and methotrexate (MTX), with or without leukovorin rescue. Of 24 evaluable patients, one achieved a complete remission and 17 had partial responses. The overall objective response r