𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Cochlear implantation in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct

✍ Scribed by Kenneth H. Lee; James Lee; Brandon Isaacson; J. Walter Kutz; Peter S. Roland


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
588 KB
Volume
120
Category
Article
ISSN
0023-852X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis:

To determine audiometric outcomes and complications of cochlear implantation in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA).

Study Design:

Retrospective review at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Methods:

Twenty‐three patients with EVA who underwent cochlear implantation were reviewed using postoperative pure‐tone averages (PTA), speech perception thresholds (SPT), Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten test (PBK50) sentence testing scores, and review of complications.

Results:

Of the 23 patients, the average age at initial cochlear implant referral was 4.7 years, and the average age at implantation was 5.3 years. EVA was diagnosed by computed tomography (nine patients), magnetic resonance imaging (10 patients), or both (four patients). EVA was identified bilaterally in 19 and unilaterally in four patients. Overall, the mean postoperative PTA was 30.5 dB (Β±8.6 dB standard deviation [SD]), and mean SPT was 25.9 dB (Β±8.1 dB SD). A subset of the patients had postoperative PBK50 sentence testing and the average score was 58% (range, 12%–84%). Four children were implanted within 1 month from entrance into our cochlear implant program (early implanted), and three children were implanted more than 10 months after program entrance (late implanted). The mean postoperative PTA was 40.3 dB (Β±7.6 dB SD) for the early group and 26.3 dB (Β±4.2 dB SD) for the late group. Four patients had reported complications, three had intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) gushers at the cochleostomy site, and one had postoperative infection requiring implant removal and reimplantation.

Conclusions:

Children with EVA undergoing cochlear implantation are at greater risk for CSF gushers, but they do well audiometrically and functionally. Laryngoscope, 2010


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Characteristics of vestibular evoked myo
✍ Guangwei Zhou; Quinton Gopen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 385 KB

## Abstract ## Objective/Hypothesis: To explore the characteristics of vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and to determine the diagnostic value of VEMP testing for this particular inner ear structural anomaly. ## Study Design: Retrospe

Disturbance of vestibular function attri
✍ Greg Licameli; Guangwei Zhou; Margaret A. Kenna πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 312 KB

## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: To investigate the prevalence and severity of vestibular impairment in children with cochlear implant (CI) and raise the awareness of vestibular disturbance following cochlear implantation. ## Study Design: Cohort study in a pediatric tertiary care facility.

SLC26A4 genotype, but not cochlear radio
✍ Kelly A. King; Byung Yoon Choi; Christopher Zalewski; Anne C. Madeo; Ani Manicha πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 135 KB

## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: Identify correlations among __SLC26A4__ genotype, cochlear structural anomalies, and hearing loss associated with enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct (EVA). ## Study Design: Prospective cohort survey, National Institutes of Health, Clinical Center, a fede