Coverage is an important issue related to WSN quality of service. Several centralized/decentralized solutions based on geometry information and under the assumption of disk sensing range have been introduced in the literature. However, disk sensing range assumption is too strong in the real world an
Cluster head election techniques for coverage preservation in wireless sensor networks
β Scribed by Stanislava Soro; Wendi B. Heinzelman
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 622 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1570-8705
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Coverage preservation is one of the basic QoS requirements of wireless sensor networks, yet this problem has not been sufficiently explored in the context of cluster-based sensor networks. Specifically, it is not known how to select the best candidates for the cluster head roles in applications that require complete coverage of the monitored area over long periods of time. In this paper, we take a unique look at the cluster head election problem, specifically concentrating on applications where the maintenance of full network coverage is the main requirement. Our approach for cluster-based network organization is based on a set of coverage-aware cost metrics that favor nodes deployed in densely populated network areas as better candidates for cluster head nodes, active sensor nodes and routers. Compared with using traditional energy-based selection methods, using coverage-aware selection of cluster head nodes, active sensor nodes and routers in a clustered sensor network increases the time during which full coverage of the monitored area can be maintained anywhere from 25% to 4.5Γ, depending on the application scenario.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Coverage is an important issue in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) and is often used to measure how well a sensor field is monitored by the deployed sensors. If the area covered by a sensor can also be covered by some other sensors, this sensor can go into an energyβsaving sleep state wi
## Abstract In this paper, the βlocalized and loadβbalanced clustering (LLBC)β protocol is proposed for the energy savings and lifetime increases of wireless sensor networks. LLBC contains two approaches. One is improved cluster head rotation (ICHR) and the other is modified static clustering (MSC)