✦ LIBER ✦

Closed-Suction Drainage versus No Drainage Following Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Stage IB Cervical Cancer

✍ Scribed by Bruce Patsner

Book ID: 115616529
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1995
Tongue: English
Weight: 175 KB
Volume: 57
Category: Article
ISSN: 0090-8258
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1131

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A prospective randomized study comparing

A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer

✍ Jatupol Srisomboon; Chailert Phongnarisorn; Prapaporn Suprasert; Chalong Cheewak 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 52 KB

## Abstract ## Objective: To evaluate the postoperative morbidity and lymphocyst formation in invasive cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHPL) with no drainage and no peritonization compared with retroperitoneal drainage and peritonization. ## Me

To Drain or Not To Drain: A Retrospectiv

To Drain or Not To Drain: A Retrospective Study of Closed-Suction Drainage Following Radical Hysterectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

✍ Janine K. Jensen; Joseph A. Lucci III; Philip J. DiSaia; Alberto Manetta; Michae 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 237 KB

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Vincristin

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Vincristine and Cisplatin Followed by Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for FIGO Stage IB Bulky Cervical Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Pilot Study

✍ Gary L. Eddy; Alberto Manetta; Ronald D. Alvarez; Laura Williams; William T. Cre 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 272 KB