Clinical trials versus intuition in evaluating the results of laser photocoagulation
โ Scribed by D. Wong; R. K. Blach
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 335 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0165-5701
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Clinical trials are often used to evaluate the efficacy of a given treatment. The results of clinical trials however do not always agree with a clinician's experience or intuition.
The merits and demerits of Clinical Trials versus Intuition are discussed by using the laser photocoagulation trials of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, Central serous retinopathy, Branch Vein Occlusion (treatment for macular oedema), Senile Macular Degeneration, and Pigment Epithelial Detachment.
A model based on Intuition is used to explain the discrepancy between the results of the British and American trials of Branch Vein Occlusion and Senile Macular Degeneration.
Proposals on the presentation of Clinical Trials and the place of Intuition are made.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This study concerns 75 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity who were patients at the Gustave-Roussy Institute between December 1966 and July 1973. These patients were divided into two groups. The first group was comprised of 39 patients who underwent elective radical neck dissect
The aim of this study was to compare nifedipine and carvedilol in the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The study included 50 patients who developed arterial hypertension after OLT. Twenty-five patients received nifedipine (group A), and 25 rece