𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor C and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Mitsuyuki Arinaga; Tsuyoshi Noguchi; Shinsuke Takeno; Masao Chujo; Takashi Miura; Yuzo Uchida


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
491 KB
Volume
97
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF‐C) plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis and activates VEGF receptor 3 (VEGFR‐3). By contrast, lymphatic spread is an important prognostic factor in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The objective of the current study was to determine whether the expression of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 correlates with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in patients with primary NSCLC.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 180 consecutive patients who underwent complete resection for NSCLC and who did not receive any chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgery. Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 was performed. The clinicopathologic implications of VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Of 180 patients with NSCLC, 137 patients (76.1%) were positive for VEGF‐C, and 40 patients (22.2%) were positive for VEGFR‐3. VEGF‐C expression was observed frequently in patients with adenocarcinoma (P = 0.026). For VEGFR‐3 expression, significant correlations were demonstrated with age (P = 0.02), gender (P = 0.008), and histologic differentiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.03). Patients who had positive staining for VEGF‐C showed significantly less favorable survival rates compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGF‐C (P = 0.003). The survival rates of patients who had positive staining for VEGFR‐3 also were significantly lower compared with patients who had negative staining for VEGFR‐3 (P < 0.001). Patients who had positive staining for both VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 exhibited the most unfavorable prognoses. Univariate analysis revealed the following prognostic factors: gender (P = 0.03), tumor status (T1,T2 vs. T3; P < 0.01), lymph node status (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), tumor size (≤ 35 mm vs. > 35 mm; P < 0.01), disease stage (Stage I vs. Stages II and III; P < 0.01), VEGF‐C expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01), VEGFR‐3 expression (negative vs. positive; P < 0.01) and combined VEGF‐C and/or VEGFR‐3 expression (both positive vs. VEGF‐C or VEGFR‐3 positive; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that VEGFR‐3 expression was the only independent negative prognostic factor (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

VEGF‐C and VEGFR‐3 expression may be indicative of survival rates for patients with NSCLC. Cancer 2003;97:457–64. © 2003 American Cancer Society.

DOI 10.1002/cncr.11073


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Vascular endothelial growth factor C and
✍ Naoyo Nishida; Hirohisa Yano; Kan Komai; Takashi Nishida; Toshiharu Kamura; Masa 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 424 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family and VEGF receptors (VEGFR) play an essential role in the angiogenesis of both pathologic and nonpathologic conditions. However, the prognostic significance of VEGF and VEGFR expression in ovarian carcinoma is unclear.

Vascular endothelial growth factor and s
✍ Susan K. Lutgendorf; Erica L. Johnsen; Brian Cooper; Barrie Anderson; Joel I. So 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 94 KB 👁 1 views

## Background: The modulation of immunologic activities relevant to cancer by behavioral factors, such as stress, depression, and social support, is well documented. however, associations of behavioral factors with cytokines involved in tumor angiogenesis have not been studied. vascular endothelial