๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Clinical significance of the quantitative assessment of estrogen receptors in advanced breast cancer

โœ Scribed by R. Paridaens; R. J. Sylvester; E. Ferrazzi; N. Legros; G. Leclercq; J. C. Heuson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1980
Tongue
English
Weight
658 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The predictive value of the estrogen receptor (ER) assay with regard to the response to hormonal treatment was analyzed in women with advanced breast carcinoma. The significance of ten clinical variables of putative prognostic value was also investigated. A total of 49 courses of endocrine therapy were available for study. The respective merits of using the receptor information as a qualitative or a quantitative variable were compared. Linear logistic regression analysis showed that the quantitative information was significantly related to the therapeutic response (P < 0.0001) and proved to be superior to the qualitative information. Compared with the clinical variables tested with the logistic model, receptor concentration was by far the most important single predictor of response. Nevertheless, introduction of two of these clinical variables (i.e., age and menopausal status) into the model in addition to receptor concentration improved its predictive value. Presented in graphic form, the improved model provides a simple means to estimate the probability that a given patient will respond to endocrine therapy.

Successive ER assays were available in a series of patients who had received no systemic treatment. In ER+ cases, there was a significant correlation between receptor concentrations in the consecutive assays. There was no influence of the time interval between tissue samplings. Data were also consistent in ER-patients. These results give support to the practice of routine receptor determination in the primary tumor at the time of mastectomy.

It is concluded that the distinction between hormone-responsive and hormone-resistant tumors appears artificial. The therapeutic implications of a continuous gradient of hormone-dependency among breast cancers are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Significance of quantitative assessment
โœ J. C. Heuson; E. Longeval; W. H. Mattheiem; M. C. Deboel; R. J. Sylvester; G. Le ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1977 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 537 KB

The predictive significance of quantitative assessment of estrogen receptors in tumor tissue was analyzed in women with advanced breast carcinoma. Receptor concentration was measured by the aH-estradiol binding capacity of the cytosol fraction of biopsies taken before initiation of the treatment. Th

Estrogen receptors and responsiveness of
โœ Bohumil A. Samal; Samuel C. Brooks; Glen Cummings; Luis Franco; Ervin A. Hire; S ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1980 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 278 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

We reviewed 89 patients with disseminated breast cancer who had at least one valid estrogen receptor (ER) assay and who underwent one or several trials of chemotherapy. The responses were assessed by two independent extramural reviewers. Of the 89 patients, 81 were evaluable; 28 of 36 (77.8%) ER-pos