Clinical psychology students' perceptions of diversity training: a study of exposure and satisfaction
โ Scribed by Debbie Green; Tamora A. Callands; Alison M. Radcliffe; Aaron M. Luebbe; Elizabeth A. Klonoff
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 149 KB
- Volume
- 65
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
This study examined clinical psychology graduate students' definitions of diversity and their perceptions of their exposure to and satisfaction regarding their level of diversity training. Four hundred and ninetyโone students from Counsel of University Directors of Clinical Psychology (CUDCP) member programs completed an online survey. Overall, students perceived that their programs considered diversity narrowly, concentrating primarily on ethnicity, race, and culture to the neglect of sexual orientation, religion, language, and physical disability. Likewise, students expressed greater satisfaction with training regarding ethnicity/race and gender than broader areas of diversity, but rated the importance of addressing all areas of diversity as high. Although this study underscores the limited experience that students perceive they have had with various underrepresented groups, programs appear to have incorporated a variety of diversity training modalities that could be expanded upon to meet the interests of psychology students. ยฉ 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 65:1โ15, 2009.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The effectiveness of multicultural training among a sample of predominately Hispanic counseling students was examined. The results of a series of 2โfactor repeated measures analysis of variance and followโup pairedโsamples __t__ tests suggest that multicultural training was effective in increasing s
## Summary The prevalence of diversity training has not been matched by empirical research on its effectiveness. Among the most notable gaps are an absence of attention to its impact on discrimination and limited consideration of organizationalโlevel factors. Results from employee surveys across 39