Clinical psychology and the common good
โ Scribed by John Farhall
- Publisher
- Informa plc
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 106 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1039-8562
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Objective: From the perspective of a clinical psychologist within public mental health services, this paper aims to discuss factors that affect interdisciplinary teamwork, and to draw upon both the literature and practical experience to suggest approaches that may enhance the relationships between disciplines.
Conclusions: Barriers to interdisciplinary teamwork may be intergroup phenomena, organisational impediments or interpersonal processes. Intergroup barriers may be addressed through improved mutual awareness, adoption of shared frameworks, and the valuing of intellectual pluralism. Current organisational impediments, such as poor use of psychologists and confusion over team leadership, could be addressed by re-thinking in a more rational and collaborative way issues of specialist versus generic roles, and leadership in mental health teams. Most importantly, professional isolation perpetuates ignorance and breeds mistrust. Thus, the common good is most likely to be advanced if psychologists debate overarching goals and effective strategies jointly with consumers, carers and colleagues from other disciplines.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Approaches to clinical psychology which favour quantification and experimental methods are often criticized as being `positivistic'. Critics typically do not define what they mean by `positivism'. At best they merely offer hints as to what they mean by this term. An outline of positivism as a philos
It seemed to be a more prudent course to put together and to supply systematic ff broad unity to all the available threads and types of comparative activities in education. The result is an ideal construct, unattainable perhaps in its entirety, but I submit worth striving for. Such an ideal will dis