๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Clinical chronopharmacology of oral sustained-release isosorbide-5-mononitrate in healthy subjects

โœ Scribed by B. Lemmer; B. Scheidel; H. Blume; H. -J. Becker


Book ID
104719008
Publisher
Springer
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
471 KB
Volume
40
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-6970

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In 10 healthy male subjects the pharmacokinetics and haemodynamic effects of sustained-release isosorbide-5-mononitrate 60 mg (IS-5-MN) were studied after oral administration at two different times in the day (08.00 h and 20.00 h). Effects on blood pressure and heart rate after 3 min standing upright were measured in relation to the individual circadian control values. The pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, tmax, AUC, t 1/2) did not differ after morning and after evening dosing, tmax being 5.2 h and 4.9 h, respectively. In contrast, the cardiovascular effects of IS-5-MN were clearly circadian phase-dependent. The maximum decrease in blood pressure decrease and increase in heart rate occurred significantly earlier after the evening (BPsys 2.8 h; BPdia 2.9 h; HR 3.8 h) than after the morning dose (BPsys 5.0 h; BPdia 6.0 h; HR 5.2 h). Thus, the peak haemodynamic effects coincided with the peak drug concentration after the morning dose, whereas the peak effect was in advance of the peak drug concentration after the evening dose of IS-5-MN. The data provide evidence of circadian phase-dependency in the dose-response relationship of oral IS-5-MN.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A combined single and multiple dose phar
โœ G. Storm; B. Oosterhuis; J. Bron; A. J. Wittebrood; A. P. De Jong; J. H. G. Jonk ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 596 KB

Pharmacokinetics of 20 mg isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN) after single and multiple administration of two different tablet formulations were investigated in twelve healthy human subjects using an open, randomized, two-way crossover experimental design. Pentacard@ 20 mg tablets were compared with