Classifying sex biased congenital anomalies

✍ Scribed by Lubinsky, Mark S.

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1997
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 119 KB
• Volume: 69
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0148-7299
• DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970331)69:3<225::aid-ajmg1>3.0.co;2-k

✦ Synopsis

The reasons for sex biases in congenital anomalies that arise before structural or hormonal dimorphisms are established has long been unclear. A review of such disorders shows that patterning and tissue anomalies are female biased, and structural findings are more common in males. This suggests different gender dependent susceptibilities to developmental disturbances, with female vulnerabilities focused on early blastogenesis/ determination, while males are more likely to involve later organogenesis/morphogenesis. A dual origin for some anomalies explains paradoxical reductions of sex biases with greater severity (i.e., multiple rather than single malformations), presumably as more severe events increase the involvement of an otherwise minor process with opposite biases to those of the primary mechanism. The cause for these sex differences is unknown, but early dimorphisms, such as differences in growth or presence of H-Y antigen, may be responsible. This model provides a useful rationale for understanding and classifying sexbiased congenital anomalies. Am.