𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Classical potential energy calculations for ApA, CpC, GpG, and UpU. The influence of the bases on RNA subunit conformations

✍ Scribed by Suse B. Broyde; Roger M. Wartell; Steven D. Stellman; Brian Hingerty; Robert Langridge


Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
1975
Tongue
English
Weight
798 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0006-3525

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Classical potential energy calculations have been made for the ribodinucleoside monophosphates ApA, CpC, GpG, and UpU. Van der Waal's, electrostatic, and torsional contributions to the energy were calculated, and the energy was minimized with the seven backbone conformational angles as simultaneously variable parameters. At the global minimum, ApA and CpC have conformations like double helical RNA: the angles Ο‰β€² and Ο‰ are g^βˆ’^g^βˆ’^, the sugar pucker is C3′‐endo, and the bases are anti. GpG and UpU, on the other hand, have the Ο‰β€²,Ο‰ angle pair g^βˆ’^t at the global minimum, and for GpG the bases are syn. Energy contour maps for Ο‰β€² and Ο‰ show two broad, low energy regions for ApA, CpC, and UpU: one is g^βˆ’^g^βˆ’^, and the second encompasses g^βˆ’^t and g^+^g^+^ within a single lowenergy contour. The two regions are connected by a path at 10–13 kcal./mole. For GpG, with bases syn, however, only a small low‐energy region at g^βˆ’^t is found. The helical β€˜A’ RNA conformation is 8.5 kcal/mole higher for this molecule. Thus, the base composition is shown to influence the conformations adopted by dinucleoside phosphates. Comparison of calculations with experimetal data, where available, show good agreement.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The A and B conformations of DNA and RNA
✍ Suse B. Broyde; Steven D. Stellman; Roger M. Wartell πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1975 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 671 KB

## Abstract In order to obtain a molecular picture of the A and B forms of a DNA subunit, potential energy calculations have been made for dGpdC with C(3β€²)‐__endo__ and C(2β€²)‐__endo__ [or C(3β€²)‐__exo__] sugar puckerings. These are compared with results for GpC. The global minima for dGpdC and GpC a