Circulating carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic carcinoma
โ Scribed by Martin H. Kalser; Jamie S. Barkin; D. Redlhammer; A. Heal
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1978
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 306 KB
- Volume
- 42
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Circulating CEA levels were determined in 102 patients with histologically proven pancreatic carcinoma and 26 patients with chrdnic pancreatitis. In the group with pancreatic carcinoma eleven patients had resectable tumors, the mean CEA in the nonjaundiced patients was 10 ? 5 ng/ml while the mean value in jaundiced patients in this group was 27 f 40. Thirty-four patients with nonmetastatic locally unresectable disease had a mean serum CEA of 25 5 52 with a range of 1 to 250 ng/ml. Twenty-one percent had values of 5 ng/ml or less. The mean value in 57 patients with metastatic disease was 97 * 194 with a range of 0.5 to 1000 ng/ml and 19 percent had values of 5 ng/ml or less. Survival of patients with locally unresectable or metastatic carcinoma was significantly longer in those patients who had a normal CEA at the time of diagnosis. Circulating CEA in the metastatic group was much lower in patients with nonhepatic metastases as well as in those with well differentiated adenocarcinoma histology. Twenty-three patients with chronic pancreatitis and normal serum bilirubin had a mean CEA value of 5.3 f 4 ng/ml with 65% of values being 5 ng/ml or less but the CEA ranged from 4.6 to 27 in three who were jaundiced.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Twenty-three (85%) of 27 patients with pancreatic cancer tested for CEA by the method of Gold were positive. The CEA assay was more frequently positive in patients with cancer of the pancreas than were any other diagnostic tests used, including upper gastrointestinal series,g hypotonic duodenography
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were determined in 742 postoperative patients with breast cancer. Within this group the percentage of elevated (24.0 ng/ml) assays increased with UICC clinical stage and was 14.8% (12/81), 23.7% (27/114), 73.1% (190/260) and 20.0% (49/245) for stages I, 11, 111,