Estimation of gene trees is the first step in testing alternative hypotheses about the evolution of multigene families. The standard practice for inferring gene family history is to construct trees that meet some objective criteria based on the fit of the character state changes (nucleotide or amino acid changes) to the gene tree. Unfortunately, analysis of character state data can be misleading. In addition, this approach ignores information about the relationships of the species from which the genes have been sampled. In this paper I explore using statistics of fit between the character data and gene trees and the reconciliation of the gene and species trees for choosing among alternative evolutionary hypotheses of gene families. In particular, I advocate a two-pronged strategy for choosing among alternative gene trees. First, the character data are used to define a set of acceptable gene trees (i.e., trees that are not significantly different from the minimum length tree). Next, the set of acceptable gene trees is reconciled with a known species tree, and the gene tree requiring the fewest number of gene duplications and losses is adopted as the best estimate of evolutionary history. The approach is illustrated using three gene families: BMP, EGR, and LDH.