In order to interpret the clinical efficacy of conjugated ursodeoxycholate (UDC) in cholesterol (Ch) gallstone patients, the Ch solubilization in mixed micelles in 40:40:32 mM tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDC):taurochenodeoxycholate (TCDC):lecithin (L) and 80:32 mM TUDC:L systems was estimated by using a
Cholesterol Binding to Simple Micelles in Aqueous Bile-Salt–Cholesterol Solutions
✍ Scribed by Chen L. Liu
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 163 KB
- Volume
- 190
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9797
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
the technique of measuring the difference of Ch concentra-The true thermodynamic activity (A T ) of cholesterol (Ch) in tion in a solution to estimate the amount of Ch in the silicone aqueous solutions containing taurocholate (TC) -Ch was deterpolymer. The relationship between A T and Ch concentration mined by employing a direct assay of a 1 1 2-cm silicone polymer in the tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDC) -Ch, TC-Ch, and film with 0.025 cm thickness. Using the A T data, information on taurochenodeoxycholate (TCDC) -Ch systems has been rethe nature of micellar species present in the TC-Ch system, and ported to be linear up to unit activity (i.e., A T Å 1), indicatemploying a binding-site model previously developed for tauroursoing that Henry's law is obeyed (8-10). Based on the A T deoxycholate (TUDC) -Ch and taurochenodeoxycholate (TCDC)data, Liu et al. presented a quantitative model to interpret Ch systems, it appeared that the Ch-binding affinity for simple bilethe nature of Ch binding by simple micelles (12). This salt micelles corresponds precisely with the order of hydrophobicity, TUDC õ TC õ TCDC. Further, although simple TC micelles and model showed that simple TUDC micelles have only one simple TCDC micelles have similar binding capacities, the first Ch binding site, whereas simple TCDC micelles exhibit a twobinding to a simple TC micelle may not significantly facilitate the site binding capacity. second Ch binding, as occurs in simple TCDC micelles. For TUDC-
Although the difference method is a good start for de-Ch, TC-Ch, and TCDC-Ch systems, the concentration of bound termining the A T , a large amount of the polymer needs to simple micelles increased with increasing A T values, whereas the be used to increase sensitivity. Actually, the amount of Ch unbound simple micelle concentration decreased proportionally. in the silicone polymer phase (i.e., A T ) can be determined These results provide insights into the possible influence of bile-salt directly by ethanol extraction (10). In addition, since the species on Ch-binding to simple micelles in bile-salt-Ch solutions. rate of transfer of Ch from solution into the silicone polymer
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The interaction of cholesterol with fatty acid salt solutions was investigated as a potential method for gallstone dissolution. In the presence of sodium oleate or laurate, crystalline cholesterol was rapidly converted into a lamellar liquid crystalline phase. Analysis of the mesophase showed that i
We have conducted a detailed quasielastic light scattering (QELS) study of aqueous solutions containing conjugated ursodeoxycholate (UDC), lecithin (L), and cholesterol (Ch), and have correlated the QELS results with measurements of the Ch thermodynamic activity \(\left(A_{\mathrm{T}}\right)\) previ